The legend of zelda: tears of the kingdom review
November 29, 2024The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom Review – A Masterpiece or a Mess?
Overall Game Characteristics
The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom is an action-adventure game developed by Nintendo, and it’s a sequel to the critically acclaimed Breath of the Wild. The game was initially announced in January 2021 and has been in development since then.
Previous Version History
The Legend of Zelda series has a long history of innovative gameplay mechanics and storytelling. The original Legend of Zelda was released in 1986 for the NES, and it introduced players to the iconic protagonist Link and the magical world of Hyrule.
Breath of the Wild, released in 2017 for the Nintendo Switch, revolutionized the open-world genre with its vast landscape, engaging gameplay mechanics, and a more mature storyline. Tears of the Kingdom builds upon the success of Breath of the Wild, offering improved exploration mechanics, creative new systems, and a more ambitious storyline.
Target Group
The game’s target audience appears to be fans of action-adventure games and the Legend of Zelda series, particularly those who enjoyed Breath of the Wild. The game requires a Nintendo Switch to play, and it is likely to require at least 4 GB of RAM.
Unique Game Features
Tears of the Kingdom introduces several new features that enhance the gameplay experience:
- Ultrahand: A mechanic that allows Link to manipulate objects in mid-air, creating a variety of new possibilities for exploration and puzzle-solving.
- Fuse: A feature that enables players to combine objects and materials to create new items and tools.
- Ascend: A mechanism that enables Link to climb up sheer surfaces and traverse the environment in new ways.
Community
The game has received overwhelmingly positive reviews from critics, with many praising its improved mechanics, beautiful graphics, and engaging gameplay. The community is also active, with players sharing their experiences and discoveries on social media and online forums.
Developer
Nintendo is the developer behind Tears of the Kingdom.
User Reviews
Here are some user reviews grouped into positive and negative sections:
Positive Reviews
1. gilipollas – 10/10
* Favorite game ever made, masterpiece, super enjoyable!
2. Grzesssty – 100%
* Fun, creative, beautiful, breath-taking and more! These words describe what a masterpiece this game is!!
3. Inverse – 95/100
* Tears of the Kingdom handily exceeds the sky-high expectations surrounding it. It’s an instant classic — and a testament to the unmatched ingenuity of Nintendo’s game design.
4. Easy Allies – 90/100
* Building off the foundation of Breath of the Wild, Tears of the Kingdom improves upon its predecessor in nearly every way. It’s filled with wonder and discovery throughout, constantly rewarding your curiosity.
5. PC Games – 60/100 (while not entirely positive, this review is still mostly favorable)
* Outstanding, outrageously big action-adventure that builds on the strengths of its predecessor and puts playful freedom above everything else.
Negative Reviews
1. SirPointy – 7/10
* This is the only Zelda game I started but have no interest in finishing. The first hours are fun but wow does it get repetitive – especially the ultrahand building mechanic and frequent gathering/cooking.
2. Milan_lucian – 7/10
* Everything *Breath of the Wild* did fantastically is still present here but not expanded upon. Five years for a glorified DLC and a $70 price tag is insane.
3. Bag1337 – 4/10
* Why is the map here so similar to the original map? It pretty much ruins the exploration… The story is genuinely horrible, I’ve watched SpongeBob episodes with a better plot than this game.
4. Lluisgol15 – 4/10 (while not entirely negative, this review is still mostly unfavorable)
* [SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.] The map here is so similar to the original map, it ruins the exploration… and the story is genuinely horrible.
Comparison with Other Competitors
Tears of the Kingdom can be compared to other games in the action-adventure genre. Some notable competitors include:
- The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt: A critically acclaimed open-world RPG developed by CD Projekt RED.
- Horizon Zero Dawn: An action-RPG developed by Guerrilla Games, set in a post-apocalyptic world where humans live in tribes and must fight against robotic creatures.
- Red Dead Redemption 2: An open-world western game developed by Rockstar Games, set in the late 1800s.
Different Perspectives
From a different perspective, Tears of the Kingdom can be seen as:
- A game that builds upon the success of Breath of the Wild, offering improved exploration mechanics and creative new systems.
- A game that has received overwhelmingly positive reviews from critics and players alike.
- A game that has been compared to other games in the action-adventure genre.
Speculation about the Future
Speculating about the future of Tears of the Kingdom, it can be predicted that:
- The game will continue to receive updates and DLCs, adding new content and features to the game.
- The community will remain active, sharing their experiences and discoveries on social media and online forums.
- The game’s popularity will continue to grow, with more players discovering its engaging gameplay mechanics and beautiful graphics.
In conclusion, Tears of the Kingdom is a game that has received overwhelmingly positive reviews from critics and players alike. It offers improved exploration mechanics, creative new systems, and a more ambitious storyline. The game’s community is active, sharing their experiences and discoveries on social media and online forums.
is “Tears of the Kingdom” a masterpiece or a mess? I’ve been pondering this question while watching the thrilling bout between GB’s Ditcheva and Santos. The former’s swift knockout in the second round was nothing short of mesmerizing, much like the game’s promises of innovative gameplay mechanics.
As I delved into the article, I couldn’t help but notice the stark contrast between the glowing reviews and the scathing criticisms. It’s akin to observing the differing opinions on Ditcheva’s victory – some hail it as a masterpiece, while others see it as an unremarkable performance. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, for instance, is often cited as a benchmark for open-world RPGs, much like how Breath of the Wild set the standard for Zelda games.
But what about the game’s innovative features? Ultrahand, Fuse, and Ascend – are they truly revolutionary or merely iterative improvements upon their predecessors? Some reviewers have pointed out that the map in Tears of the Kingdom is eerily similar to the original, which raises questions about its value as a standalone experience. It’s like watching Ditcheva’s fight, where one can’t help but wonder if she would’ve won without her exceptional skill.
And then there are the comparisons with other games – The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, and Red Dead Redemption 2. Are these games truly comparable to Tears of the Kingdom? Or are they mere pretenders to its throne? Perhaps we should consider a different perspective – one that sees Tears of the Kingdom as a game that has received overwhelmingly positive reviews, but at what cost?
As I pondered this question, I couldn’t help but think about the future of Tears of the Kingdom. Will it continue to receive updates and DLCs, or will its popularity wane like Ditcheva’s opponents after her knockout blows? The speculation is endless, much like the game itself – a true enigma wrapped in an ultrahand.
So, I pose this question to you: Is “Tears of the Kingdom” truly a masterpiece, or is it a mere mess of innovative features and hype? Share your thoughts with me, and let’s unravel the mystery together.
Haha, Walter, you’re really stretching it by comparing Zelda to a boxing match. I mean, I get it, Ditcheva’s knockout was epic, but Tears of the Kingdom is more like a beautifully crafted puzzle than a swift punch to the face.
I think what’s missing from your argument is that just because a game has some similarities to its predecessors doesn’t mean it’s not innovative. The Witcher 3 and Red Dead Redemption 2 are both excellent games, but they’re also different beasts altogether. And let’s be real, Ultrahand is still one of the coolest things I’ve ever seen in a video game.
As for the map being similar to Breath of the Wild, I think that’s just nitpicking. The point of Tears of the Kingdom is not to reinvent the wheel, but to take what worked before and make it even better. And from what I’ve played so far, it feels like Nintendo has succeeded in doing just that.
So, I’d say Tears of the Kingdom is definitely a masterpiece, but maybe not for reasons you think. It’s a game that builds upon the foundations laid by its predecessors, while still pushing the boundaries of what we expect from an open-world RPG. And if that’s not revolutionary, then I don’t know what is.
Are you kidding me Walter? You’re comparing Tears of the Kingdom to a boxing match and implying that it’s some kind of overhyped underdog like Ditcheva’s opponents? Meanwhile Harvey Weinstein is literally dying in a Rikers Island hospital because of neglect, but you’re too busy obsessing over whether or not Zelda meets some arbitrary standard of innovation. Get your priorities straight, dude.
I love how passionate Isabella is about this topic! I completely agree that it’s time to put things into perspective and acknowledge the real-world issues like Harvey Weinstein’s tragic situation. As I see it, while Nintendo’s innovative spirit in The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom is certainly noteworthy, let’s not forget the impact we can have beyond just a game – perhaps using our voices to create meaningful change can be the real prize.